Tag Archives: Discernment

Leaping to Embrace the Faith of Lady Gaga


Recently, I read an article about Lady Gaga’s “radical faith.”  The author of the article extolled her for standing up for “her faith in Jesus, and for every person Jesus related to.”  The author assumed she is a Christian, but then curiously relegated Christianity somewhere beneath the “Gospel.”

Before extolling Lady Gaga’s bravery for standing up for her faith, perhaps we should delve into what her faith really is.  We are commanded to test the spirits to see if they are of God. I John 4:1.  First, her “radical faith” appears to begin with some form of Catholicism. lady-gaga-instagram Lady Gaga, born as Stefani Germanotta, posted a picture on Instagram of her with her priest.  She lauded his homily and highlighted a quote she connected with.  Her priest supposedly said “The Eucharist is not a prize for the perfect but the food that God gives us.”  This comment is somewhat silly and does not come near describing the spiritual significance of the Eucharist.

Jesus first instituted this event just before his crucifixion and resurrection.  He used part of the Passover Seder to memorialize his sacrifice that was for the remission of our sins.  See Matthew 26:26-29 and Luke 22:19-20.  The Eucharist is about remembering Jesus Christ’s suffering, death, and resurrection that our sins necessitated.  It is not about “the food God gives us.”  Lady Gaga’s priest either taught it wrong, or Lady Gaga misunderstood what he said.  Either way the comment and her approval of it demonstrate, at best, an immaturity in Christian doctrine.

What about what Lady Gaga says about her faith?  She said she believes in Jesus.  Mere belief in the existence of Jesus, however, is not enough to have a saving faith.  A saving faith is one that confesses with the mouth that Jesus is LORD and believes in the heart that God raised Jesus from the dead. Romans 10:9.  Making Jesus LORD of one’s life goes beyond saying “I believe in Jesus.”  It requires a surrender of our thinking and our behavior.  We agree with Jesus about our sin and our need for a savior.

James said that mere confession is nice.  Even the demons believe in Jesus, but they are smart enough to tremble. James 2:19.  James stated that a confession of faith is useless unless there are works that prove a true confession. James 2:20.

Can we know if Lady Gaga has a true confession?  Isn’t that judging, and aren’t we supposed to avoid judging?  These questions, you’ve probably all heard, and perhaps uttered, betray a misunderstanding of scripture.  Matthew 7:1 is offered in isolation, usually by people who have not read any other part of Scripture, in order to condemn “judging.”  They fail to read the entire chapter to where Jesus warned us to be discerning (i.e. to judge) when people come to us with doctrines that are false.  “Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.  Thus you will recognize them by their fruits.” Matthew 7:19-20.

We can often know if someone has a true confession. True confession is accompanied by good works.  Also, someone’s belief in their heart can be measured by the things they say.  Jesus said “The good person out of the good treasure of his heart produces good, and the evil person out of his evil treasure produces evil, for out of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaks.”  Luke 6:45.

What are some things Lady Gaga has said that indicates what is in abundance in her heart?  She said “I am spiritual, I pray.”  A lot of people are spiritual. Hindus are spiritual.  Atheists are spiritual, although they would deny it.  Praying may indicate an inclination to the spiritual, but to whom does she pray?  What does she pray about?  Being religious or spiritual does not make one right with God.

She said that all religions, which presumably includes Christianity, teach hate.  She laments that all religions practice bigotry against racial groups, other religious groups, even sexual groups.  “I’m a very religious woman who is confused about religion.”  Even the most mature Christian has questions about the faith from time to time.  However, Lady Gaga’s confession demonstrates she really hasn’t considered the truth of Christianity.  She seems to be forging her own spiritual path that includes only what is convenient.

Lady Gaga goes gaga for gay rights in Washington DC

She is a loud voice for the championing of homosexual behavior.  Her song “Born This Way” is an ode to the lie that homosexuality is an inherent, natural trait.  It celebrates the sin of loving a “different lover” but insists it’s not a sin because “God makes no mistakes.”

She used the example of the woman caught in adultery to show that Jesus loves and protects people and does not judge them. She misunderstands Jesus.  Jesus demonstrated love toward us in that while we were yet sinners, he died for us. But, he had to die because of our sin.  That is a pretty serious indictment on mankind.  Our sin cost us the death of God the Son.  Lady Gaga’s understanding of Jesus does not seem to grasp him in his totality. Jesus didn’t just love the woman caught in adultery.  He did in fact “judge” her by recognizing her sin.  What Lady Gaga left out was Jesus saying to the woman “Go and sin no more.”

The love of Jesus did not leave the woman caught in adultery unchanged. In fact, it is the love of Jesus that compels our change.   Yes, Jesus offers forgiveness, and his blood paid for it.  But what I did not read in the comments from Lady Gaga or in the article by Carlos Rodriguez was the word “repentance.”  There is no forgiveness without repentance.  Repentance is agreeing with God about the nature of our sin.  Repentance sees our sin for the wickedness that it is.

The pastor who wrote the article misses the mark in trying to embrace the “radical faith” of a celebrity.  He warns us not to question her faith because Jesus “said to focus on the log in our eye and not the splinter in Gaga’s.”  This pastor, who admits his confusion about religion and insists the “Gospel” and Christianity are different, ignored the point Jesus was making.  This pastor paraphrases Matthew 7:3-4 without finishing Jesus’ thought.  In verse 5 Jesus said to first take out the log from your own eye, then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye. The point Jesus was making was not to never be concerned with the splinter in a person’s eye.  Jesus said that we must remove the similar obstacles in our own lives in order to clearly help those who are struggling with their issues.  The point is about being right with God in order to help others get right with God.

The pastor applauded Lady Gaga’s “experience with God’s tender love and mercy.” I have been a Christian a long time.  In my nearly 40 years of being a Christian, I have matured in the faith.  In that maturity I have discovered Christianity is not about having an experience with God. Experiences are emotionally driven and wear off.  Experiences are of little value unless they transform our minds.

Christianity is about us recognizing our depravity and our utter incapability to be righteous on our own. It is about understanding our need for a Savior. I do not hear that in Lady Gaga’s comments. I do not see the surrender to Jesus in her public life. AND, Jesus in fact did tell us to judge a person by their fruits. See Matthew 7 (the entire chapter, not just verse 1). Her heart might be tender toward Jesus, but she appears to misunderstand who he is and why we need to have our sins forgiven. Her “radical faith” seems to miss the mark as does Carlos Rodriguez’s praise of it.

I know this post is not an emotional, feel-good word.  It’s not meant to be harsh.  But, it is the truth.  It is offered in love.  We are not to be transformed by the renewing of our hearts, but of our minds.  Romans 12:2.  Let us not be too hasty in leaping to embrace the professions of faith from famous people and pop culture icons.  Understanding right doctrine and who Jesus really is will keep our hearts from deceiving our minds about the “radical faith” of celebrities.


One Shade of Perverted



Recently a friend of mine posted this article about the 50 Shades of Grey book and the movie that will be in theatres in time for Valentine’s Day.  A conversation following her post went like this:

My Friend’s Nephew: I’m not necessarily disagreeing with your article, but I am curious whether you have read the book or not? [sic]

My Friend: [My Friend’s Nephew], I’d read and heard about the book’s perverse content when it came out and I definitely chose NOT to read it.

My Friend’s Nephew: LoL that’s what I suspected. Just making sure thats [sic] clear to me and others reading this.

Me: [My Friend’s Nephew], have you ever walked off a curb and were struck by a bus? No? Then how do you know it’s not good for you or others to do?

My Friend’s Nephew: Lmao!! You really can’t be serious!? Only a quack would make such a comparison.

With maturity comes humility and wisdom. Maturity doesn’t always come with age. With youth ducksback2comes arrogance and impertinence. Youth dismisses wisdom usually because it interferes with pleasure. With my age I have matured to the point that comments from youth that I am a “quack” simply roll off like water off a duck’s back.

Wisdom says that one doesn’t have to read a book to understand or have a comment about its contents. One can get to the truth by taking the evidence of eyewitness testimony. Wisdomhit-by-bus knows that you don’t have to step in front of a bus to know that it hurts. Likewise, you don’t have to read this book or see this movie to know that they are bad for society.  (I know there can be some debate over the validity of some eyewitness testimony; but, if the account of the eyewitness is true then others are justified in relying on it.  In a perfect world we will all have the same knowledge about every subject.  As that is not possible we all have to put faith in eyewitness testimony at some point.)

I have not read this book, but I did borrow the audio version. I wanted to be able to answer foolish critics that reject any analysis because of a lack of experiential knowledge. The first several chapters I would label as “Foreplay for women.” These chapters deal with a chance meeting, moments of hidden attraction, subtle hints, slight flirtations, coyness, and just the right touch of cockiness that seems to attract women. After that the book quickly descends closer to hell when Christian Grey leads Anastasia Steele down the path of perverted submissive sexual deviance.  (Usually authors are very meticulous about naming their characters.  I suspect the author of the book intended the name “Christian Grey” to convey a non-judgmental, nothing-is-black-or-white approach to sexual bondage, while at the same time judging Christians for being what is perceived as judgmental.)

I couldn’t finish the book. It is every bit of disgusting that the author of this article describes. Like the visual pornography that controls the minds of men, this verbal pornography in 50 Shades of Grey is every bit as much of a lie. Such perversion is never satiated. Deviance must always get darker because our senses naturally get numb to constant stimulation. The fantasy in this book is nothing but a lie. The characters are fiction. There are no “Christian Greys” out there who both fantasize about abusing women and at the same time care for them in a loving, committed relationship.

The Spirit of the Age

The Spirit of the Age

This book is about the spirit of this age. The spirit of this age is not about wisdom. It is about maximizing pleasure even at the expense of others. That is what sexual bondage is about. Even consensual bondage hurts both the sadist and the masochist. It is unhealthy to strip one’s humanity by elevating one’s dominance over another human. Any truth claim that gets in the way of maximizing pleasure will be vociferously rejected, even censored. Maximizing pleasure is about creating your own rules of morality. It is about becoming your own god. It is about believing the lie the serpent told Eve in the Garden of Eden. It is idolatry.

Those with wisdom and discernment know that 50 Shades of Grey is cancerous to human society. There may be fifty shades of grey, but there is only one shade to this book: Perverted.  We will not be loved for the truth we speak. In fact we will be called “quacks” or worse. But, the truth we must speak, and we must speak the truth in a way that makes people want to leave the lies.